2. MEET & MAP

Different ways to reorganise and display the results of the workshop

There are many ways to organize impact pathway maps, but all maps go through multiple stages of development. Below is an example of the three stages of data analysis from a  workshop done in Lyon with VRAC, an association that organizes bulk buying groups in low income neighborhoods for organic/farm/fair trade agriculture and sold at cost.

Moving left to right, a diagram of an Impact Pathway Map begins with an activity on the left. Arrows are used to illustrate the Changes and Impacts in blue and green marker. Enablers and impediments identified along the way are in purple.
Example of three stages of data processing

Stage 1.

Impact Pathway Map at the end of a workshop beginning with an activity on the left and working through to changes and impacts on the right with enablers and impediments identified along the way. This is only one out of the 9 maps designed during the workshop, each one mapping a different activity.

Each of the 3 breakout groups worked successively on the same map, using a different color.

No particular attention has been paid to the distinction between impacts on the various dimensions of sustainability (no color flags).

Moving left to right, a diagram of an Impact Pathway Map begins with an activity on the left. Arrows are used to illustrate the Changes and Impacts in blue and green marker. Enablers and impediments identified along the way are in purple.
Workshop Map

Stage 2.

Digitization of the map with the addition of conditions, brakes, and levers for change (based on workshops discussion and interviews from Step 1).

Digitizing the map helps create a clearer view of the map and the goal is to create a general overview of the impact pathways identified in the breakout groups.

Three columns list possible Direct Effects, Intermediate Effects, and Long-Term Effects. Move left to right, each column is connected by positive green arrows and negative red arrows.
Castellano Claudie-Charlotte, Rigaud Loïc, Valette Elodie, 2022. Évaluation participative Urbal de l'association VRAC Lyon métropole, 25p.

Stage 3.

Reorganization of the workshop map that includes:

1) the addition of complementary elements from the interviews in Step 1 (in bold);

2) positioning of each item to make it easier to link the identification and name of the impacts on each sustainability dimension;

3) reflection on the pathways; and,

4) the addition of conditions for success, levers for and barriers to change, with different colours to signify negative or positive impacts.

There are other options to display workshop results. For example your results can be organized to showcase key impacts for each sustainability dimension. You may also want to summarize the main findings from the map in a short narrative as an add-on to the map (see Booklet UFIL Lyon). 

The maps drawn during the workshop can also be reorganised according to various needs. For example, it might be useful to select the results you share based on the interests of  various audiences. In the case of La Panaméenne, a Paris restaurant and grocery store that focuses on skills development and employment of immigrant women living in precarious conditions, the results were reorganized to showcase the impacts on three key audiences: women working in the organization, on the clients themselves, and on the surrounding neighborhood. Organizing the impact pathway maps in this way helped to clearly demonstrate how these key groups are affected by the innovation. 

Resources

Evaluation-URBAL-Panameenne-Paris
Evaluation-URBAL-Panameenne-Paris
Evaluation d'impact
Evaluation d'impact
Cagette enquête
évaluation participative Urbal de l'association Vrac Lyon
Evaluation participative Urbal de l'association Vrac Lyon

Funders,

Urbal has tools to help you:

  • Understand the changes and impacts connected to an innovation.

  • Better understand the challenges and enablers of an innovation.

  • Potentially track and evaluate the impact of funded innovations.

  • Assess the potential for longer term sustainability impacts of an innovation.

Researchers,

Urbal has tools to help you:

  • Conduct an overview of a food system innovation and better understand how it supports community empowerment and sustainability.

  • Bring together community knowledge holders to create an inclusive and reflective evaluation.

  • Identify innovation barriers and enablers.

  • Clearly communicate the value of  your innovation to relevant audiences.

  • Develop indicators to track and evaluate your progress towards sustainability, if you choose.

Policy and decision makers,

Urbal has tools to help you:

  • Conduct structured overviews of food system innovations.

  • Understand, integrate, and promote food system innovations.
        
  • Gain the insights you need to strengthen sustainable food policies and overcome barriers to food system sustainability.

  • Develop and improve sustainable food system evaluations.

  • Use evidence from Urbal to develop more suitable policies and programmes.

Sustainable Food Systems actors,

Urbal has tools to help you:

  • Understand and guide your actions to meet sustainability objectives.

  • Collect the information you need to make better decisions.

  • Clearly communicate the value of  your innovation to relevant audiences and attract more funding.

  • Network with your food region.

  • Develop indicators to track and evaluate your progress towards sustainability, if you choose.

Scale

The capacity of single initiatives to contribute to the transformation of sustainable food systems is weak if they are not likely to be replicated, imitated, networked, amplified, supported and disseminated at multiple scales (scaling capacity).


It is useful to consider different ways of scale for an innovation (Riddell and Moore, 2015):

  • “Scaling out” is impacting greater numbers. Strategies may include the replication or the spreading of projects and programs geographically and/or to greater numbers, or the dissemination of principles, knowledge, experiences, with the adaptation to new territorial contexts.
  • “Scaling up” is about impacting laws and policy (in legal terms, policy governance, commodity chain structuring, etc.),
  • “Scaling deep” is impacting cultural roots. That means spreading big cultural ideas and using stories to shift norms and beliefs, or investing in transformative learning and communities of practice.
  • “Scaling here” ? 

 

Urbal can, through the participatory method and result sharing, accompany changes of scale by strengthening the capacity of practitioners to disseminate their innovations and contribute to the transition towards more sustainable food systems.


How? It helps stakeholders to reflect on the conditions, barriers and levers to spread their innovations to other scales.

Ressources

  1. Video/pictures: scale picture (Source: Riddell and Moore, 2015, p.3) → visual
  2. Shared experiences and feedbacks from other users: n/a
  3. Urbal tools to help users : n/a
  4. In-depth insights to download: So What 14.

Social innovation

According to Bouchard, Evers & Fraisse (2015), social innovation is an “intervention initiated by social actors to respond to an aspiration, meet a need, provide a solution or take advantage of an opportunity for cultural action in order to modify social relations, transform a framework of action or propose new orientations. From this point of view […] social innovation aims to modify the institutional frameworks that shape relationships in society”.

In URBAL, we consider social innovations when found the following characteristics:

  • They want change, responding to a social or societal need or seizing an opportunity for activating minor or major changes in society (Chiffoleau 2016).

  • They Are inclusive, seeking to benefit the whole society by the sharing of the value produced (economic, social, environmental,…)

  • They include collaborative or participatory activities.

    • There is therefore an intentionality to change the situation in relation to the previous situation, to improve one or more aspects of the life of individuals.

    • Social innovations are embedded in a value system, they are not intrinsically good and what is undesirable (problems) and desirable (solutions) can change over time.

Ressources

  1. Video/pictures: rechercher l’interview de Veronica sur la définition d’innovation sociale (?) (Elodie ?)
  2. Shared experiences and feedbacks from other users:
  3. Urbal tools to help users :
  4. In-depth insights to download: Master thesis Veronica : BONOMELLI V. Building a participative tool to map the impact pathway of urban driven innovations on food systems sustainability: how to consider specific features of social innovation? : Master thesis. Montpellier Supagro, 2018, 50p, So What 14.

Urbal participatory tools

Participatory engagement is at the heart of the Urbal methodology.

  • This approach relies on experts (not necessarily scientists but people with long experience and/or professional knowledge) and practitioners to be successful and provide useful insights. This means that all knowledge and experiences are equally valuable and valid.

  • A participatory process helps people to engage with others and reinforces stakeholders’ understandings and relationships.
  • A participatory process requires skills and tools supported by Urbal.

Ressources

Shared experiences and feedbacks from other users:

How to map change?

To enter the logic of the URBAL method at this point you can ask what has changed since the implementation of the innovative activity, namely the path of change that was triggered by the activity.
In order to answer this question, you use an Urbal’s representation of an impact pathway.
Impact pathway: a graphical chart that maps how an activity can generate short-term and medium-term changes to achieve long-term changes also called impacts.
Changes : transformations/consequences induced by an innovative activity
Impact: long-term changes linked to sustainability, caused by short and medium changes.

 

Ressources

  1. Video/pictures: Pictures of the explanation of what an impact pathway is (see above) Ask Està to make it clean → Visual

  2. Shared experiences and feedback from other users: example of an impact pathway completed by the participants (MIRI) – PDF files :

  3. Urbal tools to help users : example of impact pathway map to be completed (Example of Milano Ristorazione → tool to ask Està to do in English . The columns include: innovative practice, activities, short-term changes, medium term and long term changes/impacts, sustainable dimension, factors (with drivers and barriers).

    → Miniature

  4. In-depth insights to download:

    Master Thesis – Impact pathway methodology literature review

What are sustainable food systems?

A sustainable food system “provides healthy food to meet current food needs while maintaining healthy ecosystems that can also provide food for generations to come, with minimal negative impact to the environment; encourages local production and distribution infrastructures; makes nutritious food available, accessible, and affordable to all; is humane and just, protecting farmers and other workers, consumers, and communities.

(Story et al. 2009).
(Ref: Story M, Hamm MW, Wallinga D (2009) Food systems and public health: linkages to achieve healthier diets and healthier communities. J Hunger Environ Nutr 4:219–224).

There are many different opportunities to make the world we live in more sustainable through food systems. The key Urbal dimensions of sustainability are:

  • Health : food security (access, quality, regularity…), nutrition, well-being, physical activity…
  • Governance : transparency, power dynamics, people’s participation, accountability…
  • Environment : protection of biodiversity, renewable resources, energy efficiency, climate resilience…
  • Social-cultural : equity, community building, confidence in the system, positive expression of social and cultural identity and culture…
  • Economic : equity, resilience, fair work and remuneration, local economies…
5 green circles form a pentagon to illustrate the 5 dimensions of sustainability. The Economic symbol is a shopping cart and a euro, the symbol for Health is a bowl with vegetables, the symbol for Governance is a government building, the symbol for Social-Cultural is traditional Japanese architecture, and the symbol for Environment is a hand holding a seedling.

Ressources

  1. Video/pictures: diagram of the dimensions of sustainability à voir avec Està → visual
    to research external brief explanatory pedagogical videos (Ophelie looks in the resources of the Unesco Chair and in the URBAL video) → visual
  2. Shared experiences and feedbacks from other users: n/a
  3. Urbal tools to help users : In-depth insights to download: IPES FOOD : FROM UNIFORMITY TO DIVERSITY – PDF file – A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversifed agroecological systems